On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-04-02 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: libthr and 1:1 threading. ] > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Also, any ETA on the per process signal mask handing bug in > > > libthr? Might not be safe to convert everything up front, in > > > a rush of eager enthusiasm... > > > > Which bug is that? I'm not aware of it. > > I think Terry is referring to the Uncertainty & Doubt as if it were > a bug over the lack of a process sigmask (moved into the threads), > as raised by the M:N group.
POSIX specifically says that the signal mask is per thread. I'd be very surprised if the 1:1 sigmask/sigpending stuff was wrong. I don't think signal handling in M:N has really been totally worked out. Their concerns were more like 'how do we do this given the new signal restructuring' Perhaps I should start quoting posix. I wonder what my legal rights are given the copyright. hm.. Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
