On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:13:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. > Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific > and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then > we don't change the intline. In other words, if we can't route the > interrupt, we just assume that the firmware knows more than we do and > go with the value it stuck in the register. 1) is a no-brainer, but > I wonder what people think about 2). Patch below:
I will test this, as my printserver tried all pci device with irq 255. I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I booted my printserver with a recent kernel. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
