> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
> >Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it
> >an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this
> >one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it.
>
> FYI, I have a no-name ("PCMCIA"/"CD-ROM") drive that also requires
> failure of the second IO range to be made non-fatal. How about just
> deleting the `else' clause as in the patch below? It seems that
> this can only affect CD-ROM drives that were otherwise not working,
> so it should be fairly safe.
This patch also tests good with my drive.
-Bill
--
=============================================================================
-Bill Paul (510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems
=============================================================================
"If stupidity were a handicap, you'd have the best parking spot."
=============================================================================
> Ian
>
> Index: ata-card.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /dump/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-card.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.14
> diff -u -r1.14 ata-card.c
> --- ata-card.c 17 Jun 2003 12:33:53 -0000 1.14
> +++ ata-card.c 26 Jun 2003 23:00:01 -0000
> @@ -131,10 +131,6 @@
> start + ATA_ALTOFFSET, ATA_ALTIOSIZE);
> }
> }
> - else {
> - bus_release_resource(dev, SYS_RES_IOPORT, rid, io);
> - return ENXIO;
> - }
>
> /* allocate the altport range */
> rid = ATA_ALTADDR_RID;
>
>
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
