On 13/07/2003 10:43, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > > On 10/07/2003 08:46, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Jul 7 22:10:40 bacon dovecot-auth: in openpam_load_module(): no pam_pgsql.so > > > > found > > > > Jul 7 22:10:40 bacon dovecot-auth: PAM: pam_start(example) failed: failed to > > > > load module > > > > > > The module probably lacks dependency information. I'll try to figure > > > it out later today. > > > > I rebuilt OpenPAM with debugging info and looked at what was happening. > > It turned out that it was not able to resolve pam_get_pass from the > > module > > pam_get_pass() doesn't exist in -CURRENT, it should use pam_get_authtok() > instead.
Ok, can you explain why it was trying to find the pam_get_pass symbol which was removed from the module (by a port patch) and not mentioned in OpenPAM? I assume OpenPAM is looking in the module, catching a stray reference to it and then slipping up from here? > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Thanks, -- Dominic <dom at cus.org.uk> <dominic.marks at npl.co.uk> _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"