On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > Timing Solutions uses the following minimal termcap for its embedded > : > applications. It has a number of terminals that it supports, while > : > still being tiny. it is 3.5k in size, which was the goal ( < 4k block > : > size we were using). One could SED this down by another 140 bytes or > : > so. Removing the comments and the verbose names would net another 300 > : > odd bytes. > : > : What's wrong with FreeBSD's /usr/src/etc/termcap.small, except it is > : twice as large and has a weird selection of entries (zillions of > : variants of cons25, dosansi and pc3). > > Mine is better because it has a more representative slice of currently > used terminal types. Maybe we should replace termcap.small with mine > (maybe with the copyright notice). I agree. termcap.small is amazingly uncurrent. However, perhaps some merging and reducing is in order. Why is a full cons25 or vt2xx needed? vi only needs a few capabilities. I think we mostly use copies of large termcap entries because copying the whole things is easier. Bruce Bruce _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
