> > So far, I haven't seen anyone in this thread seriously
> > argue against either of these points.
>
> I'll seriously argue against the 2nd point above. I don't know of a
> SINGLE person that uses /bin/sh as their interactive shell when
> multi-user. Not ONE. Every Bourne shell'ish user I've ever met uses
> Bash, AT&T ksh, pdksh, zsh.
>
I'm one...
I have to operate on many disparate systems with the
same home directory.... some of the bourne-shell variants
(e.g. HP/UX's ksh) will lock-up on my simple bourne-shell .profile.
So - I stick with the "plain/old/boring" sh.
- Dave R. -
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
