On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:08:58PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
... I think [/rescue] only needs to support those recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and /sbin if they break.
My stance is that no failure mode needs to be repairable that wasn't repairable with a static /.
I'm willing to compromise, David.
Here's what I suggest:
* I could support removing vi/ex from /rescue.
* In exchange for this concession, would you be willing to support adding fetch?
I expect this exchange would result in a net 150-200 kB savings in /rescue.
How about it?
Tim
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
