On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mike Jakubik > <mike.jaku...@intertainservices.com> wrote: >> On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> >>> As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 64-bit >>> platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been renamed COMPAT_FREEBSD32 >>> in revision 205014, so all kernel configurations including this option must >>> be modified accordingly. >>> >> >> That sounds a bit confusing, compatibility with FreeBSD 3.2? >> > I agree that the name COMPAT_FREEBSD32 is confusing, does it mean > compatiblity with FreeBSD 3.2, FreeBSD 32 or 32-bit ARCH's. > > A better name would have been COMPAT_ARCH32 or COMPAT_32BIT_ARCH. >
Seriously, this is being debated? FreeBSD 3.2? Is this a joke? I caught the humor in the first couple of replies, but you sound serious. Wow. Scott _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
