> >> No, my intension is not to compare IPv4 and IPv6 here. We have never > >> enable L3 address autoconfiguration without explicit configuration > >> before. This is reasonable and should be kept for IPv6, too. > > > > Agree 100%. Having IPv6 SLAAC as the default is a bad idea. > > > > On the other hand, I *do* like a single rc.conf knob (ipv6_enable) for > > the top level IPv6 functionality - even if it doesn't do a 100% job. > > Thanks for your response. Do you think the compromise that I suggested > in my response to Kevin, enabling SLAAC for the interface if DHCP is in > use for IPv4 is reasonable?
I think this is reasonable. However, I think it would also be worth while to revisit this point when DHCPv6 has evolved to do a more complete job (like assign a default gateway). Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
