On 9 Oct 2014, at 4:13, Andriy Gapon wrote: > I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following branch for a > phased removal of solaris cyclic code: > https://github.com/avg-I/freebsd/compare/review/no-cyclic > Raw diff: > https://github.com/avg-I/freebsd/compare/master...review/no-cyclic.diff > > The only user of cyclic now is DTrace profile provider, so I am converting it > to > use our improved callout(9). cyclic is almost a complete implementation of an > alternative to our callout(9), so having that big chunk of foreign code which > duplicates a core function is not nice. > > One thing that I am not sure about is what PROF_ARTIFICIAL_FRAMES should be on > different platforms. Also, I am not sure if the number of interrupt, timer, > etc > frames depends on a timer being used. I'd appreciate any help on this.
Can you create a reviews.freebsd.org patch for this? Thanks, George
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
