On 10/16/2011 10:28, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 15.10.2011 04:45, Doug Barton пишет:
>> dougb       2011-10-15 00:45:28 UTC
>>
>>   Log:
>>   Grant graphics/linux-tiff a stay of execution
>>   
>>   Due to the way that linux dependencies are recorded my greps for the
>>   portname, category/portname, etc. didn't discover that on RELENG_7
>>   this version of the port is still heavily depended on. Neither did
>>   my building INDEX on more recent versions of FreeBSD.
>>   
>>   So bring it back for now, with the plan to mark those ports that
>>   depend on it BROKEN conditional on OSVERSION.
> 
> Thanks for moving the port back.
> 
> However can I ask everybody to consult with the maintainer before
> touching a port? Thanks.

Not only have I made my plans widely public, but I sent explicit mail to
all maintainers detailing my plans on 2011-09-03, along with various
followups. You can see yours at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-September/009121.html.


Not that I blame you for my mistake, but I did rely to some extent on
the extensive silence from the maintainers that did not respond as an
implicit, "I don't see any problems with that plan."


Doug
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to