On 22/09/2011 12:51, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:48:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >> Hello, Freebsd-geom. >> >> We have both geom_fox without control utility and strange way of >> labelling and "conventional" geom_multipath. >> >> They seems to perform same task, but geom_multipath looks like >> "normal" module and geom_fox is very old one, before "rules" for >> modules was settled (metadata in first sector, no control utility, >> etc). >> >> Is it intentional? :) > > The geom_fox class is more of an example GEOM class.
Should it be disconnected from the build? I don't think it's ever used in practice...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
