On 25-Jun-99 Aaron Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:14:48 +0200, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>>I think I prefer the suggestion I saw from someone else, which would
>>allow
>>
>>ftp stream tcp nowait/10/10/wrap root ...
>>
>>This can be done in such a way as to be backward compatible. Looks like
>>something for the week-end, if I can convince my wife that it's a good
>>idea. :-)
>
> could you please restate the argument for this? i still haven't heard a
> decent reason for this sort of conf format perturbation. every small whack
> like this makes freebsd weirder to administrate -- there is a value to
> sharing the same inetd.conf format with lots of other platforms.
>
> if people have their undies in a wad over this, can't they compile inetd
> without LIBWRAP?
Ahem..
Let's say I have two services, foo and bar, with food and bard. I want to wrap
food, but *NOT* bard and they are both in /etc/inetd.conf. How do you propose
to solve this with the internal wrapping (which is a good idea, IMO as it
eliminates an exec())?
> aaron
---
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/
PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
