On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > [Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
> >
> > Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
> > 'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
> > build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built
> > with them, though. Also, although I caught and corrected a few spacing
> > nits caused by chopping off five letters, there may be some I didn't
> > catch.
> >
> > If no-one objects, I'll commit this to -CURRENT in a few days.
>
> Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances
> where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with
> /usr/include/net/bpf.h?
>
> In any case, this is a long overdue, and welcome change. Thank you. :)
>
> Doug
How would that conflict? "bpf.h" is a local include, so it's not the same
include path set. Plus, it would only be included as <bpf.h> if -I/sys/net.
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
