"Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I have a valid point: can we do something better than posting a SIGKILL > to the largest process? If I remember correctly, AIX sends a signal to all processes asking them to free up memory. (Processes ignore this signal by default.) If nobody responds, then it selects a victim and blows it away. I think it is nice to processes that catch the signal and try to free up memory in that it won't kill them first. (What would you call such a signal, SIGDIET?) I guess memory overcommit is desirable in a "worse is better" kind of way, because it is clearly not "the right thing." :-( (see section 2.1 of http://naggum.no/worse-is-better.html) -matt [cc:'s trimmed] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... Archie Cobbs
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... lyndon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... Julian Elischer
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1... John-Mark Gurney
- Swap subsystem overhead (w... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap subsystem overhea... Nik Clayton
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) R. Matthew Emerson
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Chris G. Demetriou
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2... Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Chris G. Demetriou