Hi again, At 10:54 am -0700 20/7/99, Matthew Dillon wrote: [...] > It should also be noted that unless your system is entirely cpu-bound, > there is no cost to the kernel to zero memory because it pre-zero's > pages in its idle loop. Thanks to distributed.net, SETI. et al, idle cycles are fast going out of fashion. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() John-Mark Gurney
- Re: Overcommit and calloc(... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() Peter Dufault
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() Charles Randall
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() Kelly Yancey
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() David Wolfskill
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() Bob Bishop
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Bob Bishop
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- RE: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Kelly Yancey