On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Mm-hmm. ld -Bshareable as opposed to ar rc.
>
> This demonstrates a superficial understanding of the process, nothing
> more.
I know exactly how an ar archive is made of all the non-PIC .o files and
a ranlib works. I know what happens when ld puts together position-
independent-code (which is position-independent because it uses the
GOT) and generates a shared library. I know how GCC only includes the
.o files from an ar library archive which it needs and nothing more.
I know that the dl* functions in libc itself are just stubs. All
I don't know is why we can't load ld-elf.so.1 for static executables
as well as "dynamic" ones.
>
> > I just think we're not seeing eye to eye.
>
> I'd be more inclined to say that John simply understands this where
> you don't. Go study up, then come back and engage the poor guy in
> debate if you genuinely feel you have a solution to offer to this
> already already much-discussed (see the mail archives) issue.
I was asking because I wanted to be referred to where I could find
where these were discussed. I'm not going to wade through a search
that I don't even have a hint on what to look for.
>
> - Jordan
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
