On Aug 6, 3:29pm, Sheldon Hearn wrote: } Subject: quad_t and portability } } Hi folks, } } I want to patch wc(1) so that it uses quad_t instead of u_long. This is } necessary if wc(1) is to produce sensible results for files containing } more than 4GB of data. Why not off_t, which should be portable and scale properly with the maximum system file size. Then the only problem is figuring a portable means of printing the result ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- quad_t and portability Sheldon Hearn
- Re: quad_t and portability Sheldon Hearn
- RE: quad_t and portability Alton, Matthew
- Re: quad_t and portability Don Lewis
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portability Warner Losh
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portability Warner Losh
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portability Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: quad_t and portability Peter Wemm
- Re: quad_t and portability Bernd Walter
- Re: quad_t and portability Doug Rabson
- Re: quad_t and portability John Polstra