Dan Moschuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >A quicker fix would be just to enclose those global variables in >mutexes. God, no. The resolver is already stupidly unparallelizable -- there's no need to make it thread-resistant too. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] e pluribus unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Dan Moschuk
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads... Wes Peters
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads... Kip Macy
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Nate Williams
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Joe Groff
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Dan Moschuk
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Joe Groff
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads... Wes Peters
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads... Joe Groff
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads... Wes Peters
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Tony Finch
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Don Lewis
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Dan Moschuk
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Assar Westerlund
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Terry Lambert
- Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Warner Losh