On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, James Howard wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > It doesn't work like that; once it's been distributed with Linux it's
> > no longer BSD-licensed, it's GPLed. They would still be unable to
> > recover post-viral changes and reuse them in their own XFS product.
>
> I heard somewhere that Linux was released under a slightly modified GPL to
> permit the inclusion of BSD code. I assumed they did this to steal the IP
> stack.
Most likely.
>
> Would it be legal to strip the BSD license of say, inetd and put a GPL on
> it? Many in the Linux community seem to think this is true but I thought
> that'd be just as bad as my BSD licensed GCC distribution :)
No. You'd have to modify the GPL to include the copyright and BSD clauses.
But what would be interesting is: I'm fairly sure that under the terms of the GPL
the end-user may opt to use a later version at their discretion. Now, if one were
to buy out the FSF...
>
> Jamie
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
