Sean Eric Fagan wrote: > > The fact that Greg thinks it's necessary and desirable (and he has > considerably more OS experience than a lot of the people who have decided it's > a stupid idea) should alone say a lot for the idea. I was waiting for someone else to bring up that point, because I might be accused of partiality. The fact that you and Terry both seem to agree with Greg makes it a very rare triumvirate. So, who's going to do it? ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://softweyr.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Mandatory locking? Christopher Masto
- Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
- Re: Mandatory locking? Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
- Re: Mandatory locking? Andrew Reilly
- Locking in Vinum (was: Mandato... Greg Lehey
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Terry Lambert
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Greg Lehey
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Terry Lambert
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Wes Peters
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Greg Lehey
- Re: Mandatory locking? Warner Losh
- Re: Mandatory locking? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Mandatory locking? Mark Murray
- Re: Mandatory locking? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek