Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>     So making DDB 'secure-level friendly' would be a useful thing
>     tgo do, I think.  The idea is not to disable DDB, but to simply 
>     limit the actions that can be performed within it if the securelevel
>     has been raised.  The sysadmin would only be allowed to issue
>     passive commands, cont, and 'panic'.  The sysadmin would not be
>     allowed to modify the running system.

That's an excellent idea - it shouldn't be too hard to add a kernel
option (say, DDB_RESTRICTED) and #ifndef the "dangerous" commands.

DES (must... write... patches...)
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to