> >(sysctl-ized) in FBSD (Some work have been done in Linux, since a > >well-known comparative benchmark offense). Would be even more usefull > >in SMP context. I don't think the wake-many problem was ever the cause of the poor numbers that comparitve benchmark unearthed. This is only a problem if you have a whole slew of children sitting around waiting for new connections, rather than doing real work. this sure isn't the environment a heavily loaded server is under :) If you're still curious, check out http://www.kegel.com/mindcraft_redux.html specifically http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9906_04/msg01100.html -- zach - - - - - - 007 373 5963 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Julian Elischer
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Remy Nonnenmacher
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- rev... David Greenman
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -... Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisite... Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -... Zach Brown
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisite... Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Zach Brown
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Zach Brown
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Jonathan M. Bresler
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Tony Finch
- Re: mbuf wait code (revi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisite... Remy Nonnenmacher
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -... Kip Macy