On Fri, 05 May 2000 11:16:29 MST, Matthew Dillon wrote: > There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in > /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move > to /bin. Given that having things move around in the base system carries with it varying degrees of pain, can you guys just explain why this is actually necessary? Didn't someone point out a way to use restore in the absence of mt? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt not stat... Matthew Jacob
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt not... Matthew Dillon
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt... Matthew Jacob
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -... Matthew Jacob
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recove... Dan Moschuk
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System R... Matthew Jacob
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recove... Matthew Jacob
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recove... Matthew Jacob
- Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt... Christian Weisgerber