Martin Cracauer wrote:
>
> "OpenSource" (without blank) is the term. "Open Source" is like
> "Free BSD", suit-wearers language showing the unfamilarness with the
> subject.
Really? I have always used (and have no plans to change) "Open Source".
I see no point at all in making it a single word. Alas, they use a
definition of their own, to suit their needs instead of the political
agenda of RMS.
> > That's because GPL is brain-damaged. It is, essentially, incompatible
> > with anything but GPL. Even the BSD license had to have a clause removed
> > (and I'm still doubtful if this makes it "compatible" with GPL).
>
> I know. http://www.cons.org/cracauer/gpl.html
>
> It's an important thing to notice, as no GPL desktop stuff can be
> built upon it.
Hurray! :-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I agree whole heartily! Who am I to disagree with a wacko like you?"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
