On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 07:06:36 +0900, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
>
>And, in the process, they are teaching the firmware about Ext2FS,
>Ext3FS, RheiserFS, (in our case) ffs, vinum, etc, so it can find the
>kernel in whatever place it is, or resorting to some sort of bootfs
>(though any software RAID would still have to be taught), with it's
>inherent disadvantages?
Well, it's more of a matter of putting the kernel itself into the boot
ROM with some small assembly/C code to turn on DRAM and an ungzipper to
load and run it. It's fairly simple, other than dealing with the
various motherboard/chipset vagaries.
It's possible to make a complete BIOS based on Linux that in turn loads
and boots another kernel, but that I don't think that this is what the
LinuxBIOS folks are attempting.
Instead they have (or will have) access to the flash from within Linux
to load a kernel directly into flash (along with its startup code)
rather than placing it into /. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
Personally, I'd set it up to hold two kernel images - one for testing
and one for emergency recovery. If a bad kernel gets into the flash,
recovering will be ... painful. But there may not be enough room.
-- Parag Patel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
