In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes: : well. as you said before, you just want a read-only sysctl. if the driver is not : secure. it's not my fault. it shouldn't be so complicated to secure it. : do you now if the permissions sets using make_dev() in i386/apm/apm.h are : used at a upper level ? or if the driver must do the job itself. Driver is trivial to secure. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- sysctl interface for apm? nsayer
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Wes Peters
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Cyrille Lefevre
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Cyrille Lefevre
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Warner Losh
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Warner Losh
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Nick Sayer
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Hajimu UMEMOTO
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Warner Losh
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Hajimu UMEMOTO
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Warner Losh
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Hajimu UMEMOTO
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Warner Losh
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Warner Losh
- Re: sysctl interface for apm? Cyrille Lefevre