On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 02:00:46PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > No, that's the one case where they help.  But people aren't trying to 
> > squeeze whole systems into small disks anymore;
> 
> Really?  News to me...

Well, even if there are/were folk who want tiny disk footprints,
and crunching everything isn't going to do the whole job, wouldn't
a compressed filesystem be a better way to approach this?  At least
that way you'd still be able to page from the executable(s), and
all of the on-disk data would bennefit too.

(I've read serious suggestions in comp.arch that it could be
benneficial to compress DRAM, with hardware decompression/
compression on the way in and out of cache...)

-- 
Andrew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to