On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Junichi Satoh wrote: > Hmm... > > I have an ATAPI ZIP drive: > ======================================================================== > wdc0: unit 1 (atapi): <IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI/23.D>, removable, intr, > iordis > wfd1: medium type unknown (no disk) > wfd1: buggy Zip drive, 64-block transfer limit set > ======================================================================== > > It does not work with your patch. It's a buggy drive. > > Probably, using only strcmp() is not enough. > We shoud distinguish buggy or not using revision number. > > #I don't know how many revisions are available. :-) > --- > Junichi Satoh juni...@junichi.org > juni...@jp.freebsd.org >
12.A, 21.*, and 23.* are known to be buggy...13.A doesn't appear to be. Since the current method of sorting out the revisions doesn't seem to be perfect, would it be acceptible to consider them all buggy unless known not to be (i.e. compare ap->revision instead of ap->model)? ----- Chris D. Faulhaber <jed...@fxp.org> | All the true gurus I've met never System/Network Administrator, | claimed they were one, and always Reality Check Information, Inc. | pointed to someone better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
