>> I have been looking at the code for UMAPfs... I am trying to understand
>> conceptually why it is so unstable...
>
>You're looking in the wrong place. It's unstable because of
>infrastructure problems which require fairly substantial amounts of
>work to correct.
>
>DES
I guess that is what I am asking... What is different between the following:
int foo(void){
return 0;
}
and
int foo_prime(void) {
return foo();
}
That is my interpretation of the code. It would *seem* to just pass the
call off to the next FS layer as if the VFS system of the kernel had done it
directly.... Conceptually I must be missing something.
--
David Cross | email: cro...@cs.rpi.edu
Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860
Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033
I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
