Doug <d...@gorean.org> writes: > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances > where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with > /usr/include/net/bpf.h?
I don't think so. The bpf.h created by config(8) resides in the compile directory and is only used there; the "real" bpf.h is in /sys/net/ (or /usr/include/net) and is only referred to as net/bpf.h. Besides, if there were any confusion, I wouldn't (shouldn't) have been able to build LINT and GENERIC with the patches. That said, thanks for asking - while looking into this matter I found another problem :) new patches will be available soon. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
