On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 08:06:26AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 23:56:17 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > > I'm unfamiliar with the ins and outs of the login_cap system. Could > > someone who is versed in it please take a look at this PR (text included) > > and let me know whether or not the suggested patch is correct. > > Quite often, we receive requests to improve documentation that are born > out of a failure to read that documentation correctly. I think this PR > might be one of those cases. Have a look at the login_cap(3) manpage, > into which I suspect the submitter may not have dug deeply enough:
I have done. As far as I can tell, the submitter is saying "Yes, the information I was looking for was in the manual page, but it (specifically, that the "root" account doesn't use the "default" entry) is buried as a throw away comment at the end of a long paragraph." The patch in the PR just rewords the paragraph slightly to make this a little more obvious for the next person to come along. I've got no objection to the patch itself, as (IMHO) it does make the para read a little more clearly. If no one objects that it's actually changing the intent of the paragraph then I'll commit it soonish. N -- [intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed, non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs the links. -- Tom Christiansen in <37514...@cs.colorado.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message