On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:16:07 -0700 
 Mike Smith <m...@smith.net.au> wrote:

 > Matt's point, which he's not making by virtue of talking too much, is 
 > that you can't make a "no overcommit" system behave like an "overcommit"
 > system, and most people are used to the sort of things that the latter 
 > makes practical.

That's just silly.  If people want a no-overcommit system, they have it,
and if they don't, they have that, too.

That's why you make it a switch.  No, really, you *can* just make it
a switch.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thor...@nas.nasa.gov>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to