> You don't seem to understand that a runaway process/one designed just > to take up memory will be much more active than your little IMAP servers, > and be the one killed, if this scheme were used.
No, what I don't understand is how the current behaviour can tell that my temporary and *valid* need for a large chunk of memory does not make me a runaway process, and therefore subject to death. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
