Alfred Perlstein <bri...@rush.net> writes: > erm, can't you point multiple signal handler entries to the same > routine? can't you also make it so that signals aren't defered > or blocked while another handler is executing so you may actually > re-enter the handler before it's complete.
I use good ol' signal() rather than sigaction(), so no, signals can't interrupt one another's handlers. > specifically how you say you increment it, then decrement it, > if you have multiple handlers where one can interupt another > you can have the counter get jumbled. Not if increment / decrement is atomic. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message