On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, John Polstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 04:59:59PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > > > > > > PAM is also "using masses of weird shared objects" but nevertheless it's > > > quite usable > > > > By statically linked binaries? > > Our PAM implementation works for static binaries too. See the > sources for the gory details. Basically it creates a library that > includes all the possible modules, and selects the right one at > runtime. There's some linker set magic involved.
This means you can't add in a new module without recompiling the static library, correct? That seems to defeat the purpose of PAM being modular for the static case :-( Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
