On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Mark Murray wrote: > > Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration? > > > > I have questions. > > Me. > > I will be bringiong in Heimdal (when it interoperates with MIT-K5).
What do you think about moving all the current '#ifdef KERBEROS' to '#ifdef KERBEROS4' and starting to integrate the '#ifdef KERBEROS5' bits in ftp, telnet, rsh, rlogin etc? I don't see a reason to rip out the krb4 stuff and delay on the krb5 userland integration. Since the userland stuff doesn't involve actual crypto code I think we're pretty safe no? I'd also be interested in hearing reasons for or against putting the krb4 specific stuff (kinit, klist whatever) in /usr/krb4, and the krb5 bits in /usr/krb5. This would simplify the task of leaving krb4 in the tree. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | win...@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
