In message <37d93d65.627a...@dons.net.au> "Daniel O'Connor" writes: : > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the : > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync, : > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree. : : Why? What kernel code does this need?
The IPFILTER kernel option. ipfw just builds the IPFILTER kernel tables. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
