Garrett Cooper <gcoo...@freebsd.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> writes: > > Perhaps. I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in > > the list archives (other than me announcing the change in response to a > > bug report), but there must have been one, either on IRC or in Karlsruhe. > > In any case, I never removed TUNABLE_INT(), so... > It does matter for integers on 64-bit vs 32-bit architectures though, > right
Not sure what you mean. The original issue was that someone had used TUNABLE_INT() for something that was actually a memory address. I changed it to TUNABLE_ULONG(). Of course, if your tunable is a boolean value or something like maxprocs, an int is fine - but so is a long. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
