Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:47:57 +0300 > Alexander Motin <m...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Comparing two ways implementing spindown, I've recalled that both of >> them using xpt_polled_action() method, which depends on working >> controller polling operation. So they could be almost equaly not good. >> But the method present in HEAD now is more universal. Looking on fact >> that need of spindown is not so obvious for SCSI devices (in SAN >> environments), we can just make kern.cam.power_down tunable a bitmask >> of supported protocols for now. Patch is attached. > > I've just committed the patch to move the functionality into ada(4). > Should it be reverted?
Both solutions are possible. I don't have strong enough position to hurry now, when it is already done. It would be nice to hear opinion of SCSI people whether this functionality needed/safe there. -- Alexander Motin _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
