On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Garrett Cooper <gcoo...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Matthew Fleming <mdf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bruce Cran <br...@cran.org.uk> wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:54:57 -0800 >>> Matthew Fleming <mdf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This is what lsof is for. I believe there's one in ports, but I have >>>> never tried it. >>> >>> Is there any advantage to using lsof instead of fstat(1) (fstat -p pid)? >> >> I believe that lsof reports on all open files by all processes, >> whereas fstat will only report on a specific provided pid. > > lsof prints out all open file descriptors whereas I thought that > fstat had to be targeted to specific files / directories / vmcore > files / etc.
Nevermind. As Andriy pointed out in a later post, I was wrong. Thanks, -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"