On Sat Apr 9 11, dieter...@engineer.com wrote: > While working on other problems with *printf(9), log(9), etc. > I stumbled upon: > > options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 # Prevent printf output being > interspersed. > > Question 1: Am I correct in thinking that PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE is supposed > to prevent this: > > ada2: 300.000MB/s transfuhub2: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered > ers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) > ada2: Command Queueing enabled > > Question 2: Why is vprintf() the only function that does this buffering? > As far as I can tell, the various functions that call kvprintf() > directly > without going through vprintf() do not get buffered. I'm thinking that > kvprintf() would be a better place for the buffering. Or would this > break > something?
i remember this issue was discussed a few times before. you might want to take a look at [1]. cheers. alex [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinPhcc8Z_BdvoEQUv-ZXlHAYOTQJwlUQDVO8iJ9 > > -- a13x _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
