On 21/11/11 5:45 PM, "per...@pluto.rain.com" <per...@pluto.rain.com> wrote:
>Alexander Best <arun...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> here's a revised patch. >> ... >> +.Sh CAVEATS >> +If the >> +.Fn lseek >> +system call is operating on a device, which is incapable of seeking, >> +it will request the seek operation and complete successfully. > >I think it would be better without the first comma (after "device"). > >IMO the whole section should be added to BUGS rather than creating >a new CAVEATS section. Returning "success" when the requested >operation actually _failed_ is a serious POLA violation. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
