On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 17 January 2012 23:01, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
If you'd like to see:
... more frequent releases? then please step up and help with all the
infrastructure needed to roll out test releases, including building
_all_ the ports. A lot of people keep forgetting that a "release" is
"build all the ports for all the supported platforms".
I don't know this so I'm asking: does fixing a port to work on a
pending release involve substantial changes (as in functionality cf.
cosmetic) to the "core" or just patching the port to work with the
core? If latter, maybe it's worthwhile uncoupling the two (core OS and
ports)?
IMHO, the two are already uncoupled too much. The problem I have
with ports is that there is not a -stable branch that tracks with
-stable core. I don't need the latest and greatest ports, just
security and bug fixes. It doesn't even have to be every port,
just the commonly used ports. There's not enough man power for
this, unfortunately, but I'm still happy that at least we _do_
have _a_ ports system :-)
--
DE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
