On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:05:55 +0100 vermaden <verma...@interia.pl> wrote: > > > I have now filled these PR's here: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164432 > > Thanks. This makes these issues visible. > One of them is already closed ... with ZERO changes, > the reason from the person that closed it: > "This is intended, as vsftpd is started by inetd" > ... great, but not ALL FreeBSD users want to use inetd, > why force them to compile it, is that one file that big > or painful that it can not be added to the port?
I don't know why the PR was closed this way, but given that the bug report is simply a statement of a fact, without saying why you consider this fact to be a bug, or any other justification for wanting the change, closing it as "works as intended" seems like a perfectly reasonable response. If you had explained *why* you wanted that changed, and provide some justification for doing so (i.e. - point out that no inetd compliant program, so the default config of the port won't run on the default config of FreeBSD), you might have gotten a different response. Of course, that kind of discussion isn't really appropriate for a PR, since it's really a feature request. As such it deserves a bit of work finding out why it's that way to begin with. All of is covered in the problem-reports document already mentioned in this thread: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/ <mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
