On Aug 2, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Kevin Oberman <kob6...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Doug makes some good points.
>
> No, he doesn't. He and Arnould being argumentative and accusatory where none
> of that is warranted.
>
> I used to run the devsummits, and we did tele-conference lines for remote
> people to participate. After I stepped down, others took it up and did the
> same thing. Usually, the lines were unused. I suspect that organizers
> simply stopped thinking about them after a while because of poor interest.
> There is no conspiracy of exclusion here, just simple human apathy.
The "Watson/Losh connection" worked really well in BSDCan 2010 :).
Advertising the teleconferencing lines might be an issue (I would have
loved to have joined in some of the remote conferences, if for nothing more
than be a fly on the wall, this year), but that's a separate thing aside.
There's some misunderstanding, assumption, etc mixed together in this
mailing chain that I think is probably better resolved with some face-to-face
conversations or maybe just more rational (and less heated) discussion.
Thanks!
-Garrett_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
