On 08/20/2012 02:19, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> >>> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans, >>> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot >>> remember Simon got an answer for. >> >> I gave a clear answer. If there are any pieces missing it's up to Simon >> to follow up with Dag-Erling. > > If you did, where was it. My email client shows 1 follow-up to > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-July/039837.html > and that was unrelated and not you.
You don't get to comment on the discussion if you're not going to follow the discussion. :) It's not up to me to advocate for the inclusion of unbound in any case, that's up to Dag-Erling. My point is simple ... BIND is not a good fit for the FreeBSD base, and it needs to go. The fact that we not only have a solid replacement for it ready to go, but a willing maintainer, is a bonus. Doug -- I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do. -- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909) _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"