On 5 September 2012 07:40, Alexander Yerenkow <yeren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all.
> I'm currently trying to make poudriere cross compile some ports for arm
> arch.
> I'm using such command (as example):
>
> env TARGET=arm TARGET_ARCH=armv6 TARGET_CPUARCH=armv6
> PATH=/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:${PATH} CONFIGURE_HOST=amd64
> STRIP_CMD=true make PKGNAMESUFFIX=-arm WRKDIRPREFIX=/tmp WITHOUT_CHECKS=yes
> LOCALBASE=/usr/localarm6 -C /usr/ports/A/B package
>
> I have problem:
> 1. When I run this command from chrooted env, all builds fine; configure
> script make check if we cross-compiling, somehow it gets "no" and all goes
> well.
> 2. When this command run by poudriere in jail, all fails as here:
>
> checking whether we are cross compiling... configure: error: in
> `/tmp/usr/ports/devel/pcre/work/pcre-8.31':
> configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
> If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'.
> See `config.log' for more details
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
>
>
> So, I'd like to propose small changes to ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
>
> SET_LATE_CONFIGURE_ARGS= \
>
> .....
> if [ ! -z "${CONFIGURE_HOST}" ]; then \
> _LATE_CONFIGURE_ARGS="$${_LATE_CONFIGURE_ARGS} --host=${CONFIGURE_HOST}" ; \
> fi ; \
> .....
>
>
> And after this, builds going just fine (of course for ports that can be
> cross-built).
>
> Is it possible to accept this? Seems to me non-destructive patch.Hi Alexander, Sorry for the late reply. You're definitely better off discussing this on ports@-- there has been some work done on cross-building ports, but it's fairly early days yet; the only real cross that can be done with much degree of success is i386 on amd64 currently. Your patch doesn't look destructive, but it could be better integrated with TARGET_ARCH setting. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
