On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 25/11/2012 20:05 Attilio Rao said the following: >> If you really want to do something like that please rename >> s/generic_stop_cpus/generic_stop_butself() or similar convention and I >> may be not opposed to it. > > As we discussed before, anything else besides "all but self" does not make > sense. So I am not sure what's the point of being that verbose in the naming.
Avoid POLA violation and show there is a change in the KPI? I'd personally prefer a new name, but I'm open on not getting it. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
