on 04/03/2013 09:57 Matt Burke said the following: > On 03/02/13 17:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> To summarize: I would be glad of either clang generated code was >> "fbt-friendly" or if ctf information was generated for >> bpobj_iterate_impl. Either is perfect for me. > > Apologies if this is a silly suggestion,
Apologies, but yes, it is :-) > but are you building with -O0? > I've noticed backtraces being hard to follow (i.e. skipping intermediate > and wrapper functions) with a kernel built with the default optimisation > level, and it seems to me that the same thing may be happening here - the > wrappers are being optimised out. > If they were optimized out, then I wouldn't be able to provide their disassembly in my original email, would I? -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
